
Bad Character Evidence and Direct Relevance
Recorded: 8 April 2022, 82 min Most lawyers know about character evidence and how it can be admitted when it qualifies as similar fact evidence.
Recorded: 8 April 2022, 82 min Most lawyers know about character evidence and how it can be admitted when it qualifies as similar fact evidence.
In this Case Alert, Professor Sankoff examines the decision of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in R v Badger, 2021 SKCA 118, a case involving ID
In this Case Alert, which adds to Professor Sankoff’s Quebec Series, the important decision R v Dhingra, 2021 QCCA 168 is examined. The decision sets
In this Case Alert, Professor Sankoff examines the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in R v Cole, 2021 ONCA 759. This useful case discusses the way
In this Case Alert, Professor Sankoff reviews R v Cowan, 2021 SCC 45, a decision from the Supreme Court on party liability. Professor Sankoff closely
Recorded: 11 March 2022, 95 min Professor Penney explores the complex Charter issues arising when law enforcement officials obtain evidence in the regulatory context. Topics covered include
In this Case Alert, Professor Sankoff adds a fifth entry into his Cabinet of Curiosities. R v Pruden, 2021 ABPC 266 is the case of the Covid
Cheat Sheet: Statements 2.Professor Sankoff’s Guide to the Use of Statements in Cross Examination
In this Case Alert, Professor Sankoff explores an important decision from Newfoundland and Labrador in R v DR, 2022 NLCA 1. It addresses the distinction
Recorded: 11 February 2022, 130 minutes In this very practical seminar, two senior members of the Bar, Daniel Brown and Daniel Song are joined by
In this Case Alert, Professor Sankoff examines the decision of Harris J in R v Holloway, 2021 ONSC 6136, a case that puts a twist on
Cheat Sheet: Statements 1. Professor Sankoff’s Guide to the Use of Statements in Direct Examination